The following is a very informative article from http://preventdisease.com/
It's almost surreal, like something out of a sci-fi flick, but
nano-microchips invisible to the naked eye are a reality that
are already being hosted in wide-range of applications. The question
is, how long will it take governments and big pharma to immerse
nano-microchips inside of vaccines vaccines
to tag and surveil global populations?
Nanotechnology deals with structures smaller than one micrometer
(less than 1/30th the width of a human hair), and involves developing
materials or devices within that size. To put the size of a nanometer
in perspective, it is 100,000 times smaller than the width of
a human hair.
More than ten years ago, simple low-cost techniques improved the
design and manufacture of nano-microchips. That unlocked a multitude
of methodologies for their manufacture in a wide-range of applications
including optical, biological, and electronic devices.
The joint use of nanoelectronics, photolithography, and new biomaterials,
have enabled the required manufacturing technology towards nanorobots
for common medical applications, such as surgical instrumentation,
diagnosis and drug delivery.
Japan's Hitachi says it has developed the world's smallest and
thinnest microchip, that can be embedded in paper to track down
parcels or prove the authenticity of a document. The integrated
circuit (IC) chip is as minute as a speck of dust.
Nanoelectrodes implanted in the brain are increasingly being used
to manage neurological disorders. Mohammad Reza Abidian, a post-doctoral
researcher at the U-M Department of Biomedical Engineering said
that polymers in nanotubes "are biocompatible and have both
electronic and ionic conductivity." He further stated "therefore,
these materials are good candidates for biomedical applications
such as neural interfaces, biosensors and drug delivery systems."
Depending on the objectives of such studies, research could theoretically
pave the way for smart recording electrodes that can deliver drugs
to positively or negatively affect the immune response.
Through nanotechnology, researchers have also been able to create
artificial pores able to transmit nanoscale materials through
membranes.
A UC biomedical engineering study appearing in the journal Nature
Nanotechnology, Sept. 27, 2009, successfully inserted the modified
core of a nanomotor, a microscopic biological machine, into a
lipid membrane. The resulting channel enabled them to move both
single- and double-stranded DNA through the membrane.
Professor Peixuan Guo who led the study said past work with biological
channels has been focused on channels large enough to move only
single-stranded genetic material.
"Since the genomic DNA of human, animals, plants, fungus
and bacteria are double stranded, the development of single pore
system that can sequence double-stranded DNA is very important,"
he says.
Such engineered channels could have applications in nano-sensing,
DNA sequencing, drug loading, including innovative techniques
to implement DNA packaging mechanisms of viral nanomotors and
vaccine delivery.
"The idea that a DNA molecule travels through the nanopore,
advancing nucleotide by nucleotide, could lead to the development
of a single pore DNA sequencing apparatus, an area of strong national
interest," Guo said.
Scientists working at Queen Mary, University of London, have developed
micrometer-sized
capsules to safely deliver drugs inside living cells. These
"micro shuttles" could hypothetically be loaded with
a specific microchip controlling the dose of medication to be
opened remotely, releasing their contents. Besides monitoring
the dosage, the same microchip could be used to surveil the patient
in conjunction with various tracking systems.
Scientists in the United Kingdom have recently
reported advances towards overcoming key challenges in nanotechnology.
They demonstrated how nanoparticles could move quickly in a desired
direction without help from outside forces. Their achievement
has broad implications, the scientists say, raising the possibility
of coaxing cells to move and grow in specific directions.
Doug Dorst, a microbiologist and vaccine critic in South Wales,
says these advances have an immense appeal to vaccine makers.
"Biotech companies and their researchers have quickly moved
most funding initiatives towards nanotechnology to increase the
potency of their vaccines," he said. If microorganisms inside
of vaccines can be coaxed into targeting or invading specific
cells, they could achieve their goal at an accelerated rate over
conventional vaccines. "Depending on which side of the vaccine
debate you're on, whether pro or con, nanobots inside vaccine
preparations could advance their effectiveness exponentially by
either dramatically improving or destroying immunity depending
on their design," he added.
Dorst claims that present day nanobot technology could just as
easily be used to advance biological weapons as they can to advance
human health. "For every fear that biotech propaganda proliferates
about deadly diseases and how vaccines prevent them, it is one
more lie to incrementally convince the masses that vaccines are
effective."
The worry for Dorst is that one day vaccines "will do what
they've always been intended for...control of the global populace."
Nanoemulsion platforms are already capable of developing vaccines
from very diverse materials. Mixtures of soybean oil, alcohol,
water and detergents can be emulsified into ultra-small particles
smaller than 400 nanometers wide (about 1/200th the width of a
human hair). These could be combined with any number of nano-microchips
with all or part of disease-causing microbes to trigger the body's
immune system.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale
de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature
Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that
can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects,
and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.”
The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough:
“At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that
once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular
matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve
reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than
in the skin."
Russia has recently announced a new manufacturing plant that will
strictly produce nano-vaccines. Project plans include development
of two vaccines for human flu and bird flu and three biopharmaceuticals
for boosting the immune system and increasing the efficiency of
antibacterial and antiviral drugs, among other initiatives.
The human body is very resistant to nanoparticles that attempt
to invade human cells. Scientists are intensely investigating
methods to disrupt human enzymes that may degrade nanoparticles.
Experts at the University
of Liverpool found a way around this obstacle that could mean
more efficient, topical drugs in the future, which could act a
whole lot faster than the ones currently in use.
All these nanotechnological advances raise many issues and concerns
about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials,
and their potential effects on medicine, global economics, as
well as speculation about government surveillance. These concerns
have led to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on
whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted.
The Environmental Protection Agency issued a news release last
week saying that it had “today outlined a new research strategy
to better understand how
manufactured nanomaterials may harm human health and the environment.”
Interesting as that strategy document is, it was hardly hot off
the presses.
Indeed, many companies advertise their use of such billionth-of-a-meter-scale
constituents as a measure of a product's state-of-the-art status,
implying that ultra-small ingredients are an inherently good thing.
They aren’t. Nor does size necessarily make these materials
worse than others. At this point it's just maddeningly unpredictable
what nano things will do.
Proponents of nanotechnology are very critical of regulatory measures
that may impeed its progression. Many of these critics have staunchly
dismissed concerns as being fear-hyped conspiracy theories based
on science fiction.
In the popular video game series Metal Gear Solid, many characters
and soldiers in general, have "nanomachines" in their
bloodstream, and are used to block pain, allow members of fire
teams/patrols to share sensory information, heal bodily damage,
as well as manipulating viruses central to video game's plot line.
Through the use of special effects and computer-generated imagery,
several blockbusters starring Keanu Reeves including The
Matrix Trilogy and The
Day the Earth Stood Still, have dramatized how nanobots could
effectively take control of their organic and inorganic targets.
Star Trek episodes and their theatrical releases such as Star
Trek: First Contact have also depicted how nanoprobes (nanites)
could infect an individual's bloodstream through a pair of tubules.
Regardless of the recurring themes of nanobots in video games,
sci-fi shows and movies, nanotechnology is a reality, and nano-microchips
are well on their way to being utilized in ways which may be detrimental
to human health and freedom on a global scale.
The development of nano-microchips are a major thrust of governments
and pharmaceutical industries who want the ultimate power and
leverage over global populations for more profit and more control.
In December 2000, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Rauni-Leena
Luukanen-Kilde, MD stated that it is technically possible for
every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then
function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life.
Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any
public airing of the privacy issues involved.
Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves
that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person
can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among
a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders,
who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which
is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers
were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline
flow into the bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers
at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see
and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield with
a remote monitoring system (RMS).
When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of
hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the
eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences,
smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred
and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected
back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced.
Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic
messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting
the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced
to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes
a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the
brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded
into thoughts, pictures, and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation
can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular
activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.
The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow
and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical
resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints.
With electromagnetic frequency (EMF)
brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals
can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual
effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic
warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent
into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions
could be registered 24 hours a day.
The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy
vanishes for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be manipulated
in many ways. Using different frequencies, the secret controller
of this equipment can even change a person's emotional life. S/he
can be made aggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can be artificially
influenced. Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read,
dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or
consent of the implanted person.
This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain
NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations
having heard anything about it. Thus, little information about
such invasive mind-control systems is available in professional
and academic journals.
The NSA's Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information
from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5
milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both
Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have
evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of
oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain
implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee experienced
brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due
to lack of oxygen.
Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic
fields and beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites,
from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical
appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation
problem that should be addressed by democratically elected governments.
However, there is currently no interest by any national government
to seriously address this issue.
The timeline for integrating nano-microchips
inside of vaccines is speculative. It could be just a few years,
months or perhaps it is here and we already unaware of their integration
within pharmaceuticals. Regardless, due to the many military and
political advantages, their implementation is inevitable.
However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and
pharmaceutical cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations
and enact national pandemic preparedness policies which mandate
vaccinations.
In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international
health regulations that would bind
all 194 member countries
to pandemic emergency guidelines which could enforce such a mandate.
Without these procedures of public health (and propagandized vaccine
campaigns) in place, there would be little or no voluntary cooperation
from the public to roll up their sleeves and accept the inoculations.
Public participation is an essential tool that will soon allow
big pharma to inject the most effective surveillence tool ever
designed into billions of people.
Although nanotechnology manufacturing
is currently available on a global scale, before biotech companies
are able to initiate mass production and testing of nano-microchips
inside of vaccines, they will likely sell the idea to the public.
Through various "health enhancement scenarios" they
will encourage participation and publicly announce regulatory
approval from the same policies and regulatory agencies they helped
create.
By mid-summer of 2009, the WHO and the Center of Disease Control
(CDC) effectively
hyped a false flu pandemic and convinced the world to submit
to H1N1 vaccines. Additional doses of propaganda and possibly
a biological event, may equally convince populations to knowingly
accept microchips inside of vaccines under the guise of a "greater
good" for humanity.
When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers
by means of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late
for protest. This threat can be defeated only by educating the
public, using available literature on biotelemetry, nanorobotics
and information exchanged at international congresses.
More information: preventdisease.com
No comments:
Post a Comment